EMAIL US：salesmanager@singi.com
- All
- Product Name
- Product Keyword
- Product Model
- Product Summary
- Product Description
- Multi Field Search
Views： 12 Author： Mark Zhang Publish Time： 2026-08-09 Origin： 本站
A mid-sized beverage bottling facility in Southeast Asia operates four production lines and supplies regional distributors across three countries. With 320 employees and round-the-clock shifts, the plant runs continuous processes where any unplanned stop creates immediate downstream delays. The facility’s electrical system was built more than a decade ago, relying on outdated thermal-magnetic breakers without residual amperage protection. The plant’s maintenance team handled routine issues, but persistent earth faults and nuisance trips were becoming a bottleneck for production output.
Under growing pressure to meet higher delivery volumes, the plant’s management initiated a review of its low-volt-level distribution network. They needed a protection solution that could safeguard both equipment and personnel while reducing unplanned downtime.
The existing breakers only provided overload and short-circuit protection. They had no residual amperage detection, so low-level earth faults went unnoticed. When a fault occurred, the electrical team had to isolate sections of the line and use clamp meters to trace the leakage manually. A typical fault finding session lasted four to six hours, during which the entire production line stood idle.
Nuisance trips were another problem. The old breakers were incorrectly chosen for the loads, and the lack of chooseivity caused an upstream breaker to trip for a fault in a single branch. This shut down multiple machines simultaneously and increased the time to restore power. Over a three-month period, the plant recorded 14 unplanned stops linked to electrical faults, with an average downtime cost of $4,200 per hour.
The facility also faced compliance pressure. Local electrical safety regulations required residual amperage protection for socket outlets and some industrial equipment, but the plant’s panels did not meet those standards. An audit flagged several non-compliance items, putting the operating license at risk.
The project team assessed several options, including separate residual amperage devices (RCDs) paired with existing MCBs, and a complete panel upgrade with remote monitoring. The separate RCD approach was less expensive upfront, but it required additional wiring and more rail space. The panel upgrade offered advanced features but carried a long payback period and would have required shutting down production for weeks.
The DZ15LE RCBO from SINGI was chosen because it combines overamperage and residual amperage protection in a single compact unit. This saved valuable space in the existing distribution boards and reduced the number of components to install. The unit also meets the requirements of GB/T 6829-2017, which the plant’s engineering team considered essential for long-term compliance and reliability.
Another decisive factor was its sensitivity to earth faults. The RCBO can detect residual currents as low as 30 mA, which provides personal protection against electric shock. For the plant’s application, this was a clear improvement over the previous setup. The team also appreciated the clear status indication and the easy-to-reset mechanism, which simplified daily operations.
The implementation was carried out in two phases over six weeks. During the first phase, the maintenance team audited all distribution boards and mapped the load circuits. They identified 28 circuits that needed replacement and ordered the DZ15LE units based on the rated currents and breaking capacities required.
The second phase involved the physical replacement. Each outgoing circuit had its old breaker removed and a DZ15LE installed. Because the RCBO has the same standard 18 mm width per pole, no significant panel modifications were required. The team also added clear labels to each RCBO to indicate which production line or machine it served.
One of the main difficulties was coordinating the changeover without stopping the entire plant. The team scheduled work during planned maintenance windows on weekends. They completed the installation for each line one at a time, testing the residual amperage function by injecting a test amperage through the built-in test button. In one instance, an incorrectly sized RCBO caused a nuisance trip during the initial power-up. The problem was traced to a short extension cable that had high leakage current. The team corrected the wiring and replaced the unit with the next rating up, which solved the issue.
After installation, all maintenance personnel received training on how the RCBO works and how to record reset events. The plant’s electrical supervisor also updated the single-line diagrams to reflect the new equipment.
Within the first three months of operation, the plant recorded measurable improvements. Electrical fault response time dropped by 60%., locating an earth fault took an average of five hours; with the DZ15LE, the RCBO trips precisely on the affected circuit, allowing the team to isolate the issue in under two hours, including reset time.
Unplanned downtime attributable to electrical faults fell from 14 incidents per quarter to four. The average duration of each stop also decreased from 4.2 hours to 1.7 hours. Using a cost rate of $4,200 per hour of lost production, the plant saved $42,840 in a single quarter.
The incidence of nuisance trips dropped by 70% because the RCBO’s chooseive coordination prevented upstream breakers from tripping. The plant also passed its regulatory audit with no non-conformities related to residual amperage protection.
In addition, the maintenance team reduced the time spent on manual fault tracing, freeing them to focus on preventive maintenance tasks. This contributed to an overall improvement in line availability, which increased from 84% to 92%. The plant’s production manager estimated that the improved availability allowed them to fulfil two additional export orders during the peak season.
The plant’s electrical maintenance manager commented: “The DZ15LE RCBO changed how our team reacts to faults. We now know exactly which circuit is affected, and we can restore power in minutes instead of hours. The investment paid for itself within the first quarter.”
The operations director added: “For a continuous production facility, the cost of downtime is enormous. The new protection system gives us both safety and reliability. We are now planning to standardise on the DZ15LE for our new line.”
For other plants in similar situations, the project offers three transferable lessons. First, conduct a full load and leakage amperage survey before choosing the RCBO rating. Correct choice prevents nuisance trips and ensures compatibility with existing wiring.
Second, coordinate the protection devices properly. Proper chooseivity between the RCBO and upstream breakers avoids unnecessary shutdowns. The project team validated coordination using the guidelines described in the study on MCB-RCBO coordination by Chen and Mou.
Third, schedule the replacement during planned maintenance windows and train the local team. This approach minimizes disruption and ensures that the maintenance staff can handle routine issues independently.
If the project were repeated, the team would consider adding a remote monitoring system to record trip events automatically. That would provide even faster diagnostics and help identify recurring faults before they cause production losses. For now, the DZ15LE has proven to be a dependable, cost-effective solution for the facility’s electrical protection needs.
